"Where have all the good men gone? And where are all the Gods?"
Published on August 31, 2005 By Chaos Manager In Current Events
I know that we're only at the 48 hour mark on this tragedy that used to be a fine, historical city on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. I know that the US is the biggest responder in international tragedies (like the SE Asian tsunami).

After this time (and a Google search) there are no signs that Europe is doing any more than parroting the news articles that the AP, UPI and NEWS.COM.COM puts out.

Where is the hew and cry from Europe seeking aid for the poor folks that are flooded out of their homes and aren't likely to be able to return for 3 - 4 months, if at all? Where are the international aid agencies that were tripping over themselves to toss money and supplies at the tsunami victims last Christmas? *waits for answers* *crickets chirp* Got that.

America is supposed to be the aid giver to the world. When America can use some assistance (regardless of whether that assistance is strictly needed), then the rest of the world gets quiet.

My wife and I were discussing this last night. If America were to strip all of the monies that we're putting into foreign governments, humanitarian aid, international relief, loans to other countries and sunk all of those billions of dollars back into America, how much better off could America be? How much greater (read: more prosperous) would this country be? How bad off would the remainder of the world become in the absence of the money that the US puts into the global society?

I think it's interesting that Americans are blasted for not giving enough (when many Americans and the American government gave plenty) during the tsunami crisis last Christmas. Now it's time to blast the rest of the world. When the world needs help, they first look to America with their hands held out. Now, America is looking for the rest of the world, not with a hand out for help, but with a pleading look - for others to acknowledge that it is time for the generosity of the American people to be acknowledged and repaid with whatever means are available, each according to their own capacity.

I'm not arguing that America should go back to the pre-WWII isolationist policies that caused us more trouble than they saved us. I'm saying that America has bailed out others through various tragedies over the years, now it's time for everyone else to step up show what they are made of.

-- "To see what is right, and not to do it, is want of courage or of principle."
Confucius


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 31, 2005
Chaos Manager you beat me to this article. I had the exact same comments rolling around in my head this a.m., but didn't have time to blog up an article on same.

I hinted at this a bit in another blog article, and I expected that an article like this might generate some hostilities from some here at Joe User.

The fact is that as we've always known, the U.S.A. takes care of itself and the world. We don't need help from Europeans who scream at us that we are not donating enough per capita to the rest of the world's causes, even when we are donating very similar (if not many times more) amounts of real dollars to those causes.

The U.S.A. will (pardon the bad pun) weather this storm and it's after effects. We'll help those that were impacted recover as best they can, and we'll use our tax monies to help everyone that needs help. It's what we do.

As to the rest of the world and their constant cries for help and demands that we do more, perhaps they should watch us now and learn to just shut up already.
on Aug 31, 2005
Venezuela has offered assistance.  Nothing From Old Europe yet tho.
on Aug 31, 2005
Thanks, Doc!

For those interested, a quick stop by Google found Link as a source for an article on Venezuela's offer of aid.

And that's in spite of Mr. Robertson's attack on President Chavez.

Still no word from our "buddies" in Europe.

on Aug 31, 2005
I was thinking the same thing. Where is everyone when we have a disaster? Nowehere to be found.
on Aug 31, 2005
Where is everyone when we have a disaster? Nowehere to be found.


We should remember that next time our 'buddies' come a'knockin with their hands out


On the one hand, I do not disagree with either of these comments. However, should a catastrophe occur in another country, particularly a third world country, I would hope that we, the richest country in the world, do not get all high, mighty and sanctimonious, and just sit back and watch people die. That would truly be tragic.
on Aug 31, 2005
Dabe, in the recent past (like the tsunami this past Christmas), Americans have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for giving.

Other times ... admittedly our track record isn't the greatest. A good example of this would be our lack of action in Rwanda.
on Aug 31, 2005
On the one hand, I do not disagree with either of these comments.

Holy cats, let me mark this auspicious date on my calendar......!! LOL

However, should a catastrophe occur in another country, particularly a third world country, I would hope that we, the richest country in the world, do not get all high, mighty and sanctimonious, and just sit back and watch people die. That would truly be tragic.


Two wrongs do NOT make a right. I would hope that we wouldn't just tell people to go screw themselves.

Sorry to hear about your leg Dabe.
on Aug 31, 2005

Dabe, in the recent past (like the tsunami this past Christmas), Americans have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for giving.

Other times ... admittedly our track record isn't the greatest. A good example of this would be our lack of action in Rwanda.

One was from private donations, the other from the government.

on Aug 31, 2005
Sorry to hear about your leg Dabe.


thanks, dharma. Your back...... my leg...... Actually, this is the fourth time I've broken my leg. As soon as I can maneuver around on crutches better, and it doesn't hurt so much to put my leg down, I'll be going back to work, hopefully next week.

Two wrongs do NOT make a right. I would hope that we wouldn't just tell people to go screw themselves.


Yup. that would be too heartless to stand by and just watch.

One was from private donations, the other from the government.


I believe it was our government that ponied up $500million for the tsunami effort. However, not so much as a penny for the Rwandan tragedy. Why? I suppose one was a natural disaster, the other just man-made genocide, and therefore "acceptable." Or, because Rwanda wasn't as sexy a humanitarian effort as a tsunami relief, I suppose. Tell that to the Rwandans who were being slaughtered, and hacked to pieces for no reason other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time when hoards of militia came to butcher their countrymen.
on Aug 31, 2005
The Rwanda situation was a Charlie-Foxtrot for everybody involved (or rather, everybody that didn't get involved). I mean, who cares about a few hundred thousand Africans, anyways?
on Aug 31, 2005

Or, because Rwanda wasn't as sexy a humanitarian effort as a tsunami relief, I suppose. Tell that to the Rwandans who were being slaughtered, and hacked to pieces for no reason other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time when hoards of militia came to butcher their countrymen.

Tell that to Bill Clinton.  It was on his watch.

on Aug 31, 2005
Great Article Chaos!!

I started in on a comment, but it quickly grew to article perportions. Still, wouldn't want to rob you of the points, or let it go without saying how much I agree!!

Where are all those who were so vocal against the U.S?
on Sep 01, 2005
Venezuela has offered assistance. Nothing From Old Europe yet tho.


Sorry doc but you're wrong on this. Blair has already offered help as has Germany.
on Sep 01, 2005
Blair has already offered help as has Germany.

Sounds like 'Old Europe' and 'New Europe' are pitching in.
on Sep 01, 2005
Here (Link) is one article that mentions that the average people in Europe (Switzerland and Austria in particular for that article) are very interest in helping. Lots of sympathy.



2 Pages1 2