Or something else to be scared of come Jan 20, 2009
Published on March 10, 2008 By Chaos Manager In Politics

This weekend, I had a converstion with my mom regarding the presidential election this year.  As a Civics teacher in the county's middle school, it's something that she's got to pay extra attention to, for obvious reasons. 

During the conversation, she made a comment that scared me, at first.  If Obama manages to win the Democratic nomination and the general election in November, what kind of cabinet is he likly to try to bring on board?  Some of our first thoughts were oddballs like Louis Ferrakhan or Al Sharpton.  Then, we remembered something - regardless of the nutjobs they TRY to bring in, the individuals still have to pass the Senate's confirmation process. 

Regardless of whether it's McCain, Obama, or Hillary bringing appointments for the various Cabinet seats, I'm comforted that they'll still have to pass the Senate.  Given the current environment of animosity and the fairly balanced Senate make up, there will be a difficult time getting qualified individuals through confirmation, much less the wackjobs that most of us are scared will be brought in.

So, JU - what do you think is going to happen with the Cabinet, given the folks that are currently vying for the chance to make those appointments?


Comments
on Mar 10, 2008

Assuming that Obama would even consider Farrakan or Sharpton (and he's already denounce anything to do with Frarrakan) is a sad reflection that this is what many would think that he would do.

Hillary and Obama would have to do a lot to prove themselves to the people of America if they were the ones elected President.  Hopefully, they would be given the chance to prove themselves. Although not many people agrees with this!

on Mar 10, 2008

If you want to get a glimpse of the cabinet nominees a presidential hopeful will name, just look at their campaign team.  Traditionally, most the high ranking people on the campaign team find themselves in the cabinet.

Yes, all nominees have to be confirmed by the Senate, but I disagree with your "comfort" there.  Sen. Harry Reid is the Senate Majority Leader.  That means he gets to decide when (and if) the nominees will appear for their inquisition.  If it's not someone he'll confirm, he doesn't even have to schedule time.

Yes, there are checks and balances, and they usually do work, but if a Majority Leader decides that their agenda is the only thing that matters, they can throw the "balance" off.

on Mar 11, 2008
The democrats have shown they are going to filibuster when they do not have the votes. The republicans have not. That is how we got Ginsberg.

I find no comfort in the comfirmation process.
on Mar 11, 2008

I really do think Obama is going to put in who he thinks is best, and of course it will lean to the left, he's as biased as everyone else.